Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for Xiaomi Poco F1 (Beryllium)

From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Fri Aug 21 2020 - 17:21:33 EST


Hi

First of all, sorry if anybody sees this twice. I've been messing with Thunderbird lately.



> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-cheza-r3.dtb
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-db845c.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM) += sdm845-beryllium.dtb

[B]eryllium should come before [C]heza, no? Also, aren't the non-development boards supposed to include the vendor name? i.e. sdm845-(xiaomi/poco)-beryllium.dtb


> + model = "Xiaomi Technologies Inc. Beryllium";

At least with Xperias, we settled on setting the model property to the "pretty" name, in this case Poco F1


> + pm8998-rpmh-regulators {
> + compatible = "qcom,pm8998-rpmh-regulators";
> + qcom,pmic-id = "a";
> +
> + vreg_l1a_0p875: ldo1 {

I think you forgot to include (regulatorname)-supply properties which should cause havoc with all things regulators..


> + vreg_l1a_0p875: ldo1 {
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <880000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <880000>;
0p88? Unless it's a PMIC limitation.. Please also confirm names for the rest of the regulators.

Also why are there so few regulators? And none from pmi8998? Are the rest WIP/coming in a followup commit, or are they disabled on this board? AFAICS you only include SoC/PMIC DTs which would suggest they should be there.


> +/* Reserved memory changes from downstream */

Wouldn't it look better if you included that in the main {} node instead of reopening it in the middle of the file? I mean, it works, but let's hear what others have to say.


> + * It seems that mmc_test reports errors if drive
> + * strength is not 16 on clk, cmd, and data pins.

You say that, but then you set "drive-strength = <10>;" for cmd and data, please confirm it's intentional.


> +&ufs_mem_hc {

UFS comes before USB alphabetically.


> +&ufs_mem_phy

Ditto


> +&qup_uart6_default

Ditto


Konrad