[PATCH 5.8 037/232] btrfs: fix memory leaks after failure to lookup checksums during inode logging

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>

commit 4f26433e9b3eb7a55ed70d8f882ae9cd48ba448b upstream.

While logging an inode, at copy_items(), if we fail to lookup the checksums
for an extent we release the destination path, free the ins_data array and
then return immediately. However a previous iteration of the for loop may
have added checksums to the ordered_sums list, in which case we leak the
memory used by them.

So fix this by making sure we iterate the ordered_sums list and free all
its checksums before returning.

Fixes: 3650860b90cc2a ("Btrfs: remove almost all of the BUG()'s from tree-log.c")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c |    8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -4027,11 +4027,8 @@ static noinline int copy_items(struct bt
 						fs_info->csum_root,
 						ds + cs, ds + cs + cl - 1,
 						&ordered_sums, 0);
-				if (ret) {
-					btrfs_release_path(dst_path);
-					kfree(ins_data);
-					return ret;
-				}
+				if (ret)
+					break;
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -4044,7 +4041,6 @@ static noinline int copy_items(struct bt
 	 * we have to do this after the loop above to avoid changing the
 	 * log tree while trying to change the log tree.
 	 */
-	ret = 0;
 	while (!list_empty(&ordered_sums)) {
 		struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums = list_entry(ordered_sums.next,
 						   struct btrfs_ordered_sum,