Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: CPPC: simply the code access 'highest_perf' value in cppc_perf_caps struct

From: Xin Hao
Date: Mon Aug 03 2020 - 22:37:59 EST


Hi everyone:

I want to know why my patch didn't merge into upstream ?


Thanks

在 2020/7/1 下午12:20, Xin Hao 写道:
The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get
'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use
'caps->highest_perf' instead.

Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 257d726a4456..051d0e56c67a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
if (!max_khz)
max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
mul = max_khz;
- div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
+ div = caps->highest_perf;
}
return (u64)perf * mul / div;
}
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
} else {
if (!max_khz)
max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
- mul = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
+ mul = caps->highest_perf;
div = max_khz;
}