Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 30 [build failure on arm64]

[Shaokun Zhang]

Hi,

There's a build failure on arm64:

In file included from ./include/linux/compat.h:17:0,
                 from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:13,
                 from ./include/linux/stat.h:6,
                 from ./include/linux/sysfs.h:22,
                 from ./include/linux/kobject.h:20,
                 from ./include/linux/of.h:17,
                 from ./include/linux/irqdomain.h:35,
                 from ./include/linux/acpi.h:13,
                 from ./include/acpi/apei.h:9,
                 from ./include/acpi/ghes.h:5,
                 from ./include/linux/arm_sdei.h:8,
                 from arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c:10:
./include/linux/fs.h: In function âvfs_whiteoutâ:
./include/linux/fs.h:1709:32: error: âS_IFCHRâ undeclared (first use in this function)
  return vfs_mknod(dir, dentry, S_IFCHR | WHITEOUT_MODE, WHITEOUT_DEV);
                                ^
./include/linux/fs.h:1709:32: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each
function it appears in
./include/linux/fs.h: At top level:
./include/linux/fs.h:1855:46: warning: âstruct kstatâ declared inside parameter list
  int (*getattr) (const struct path *, struct kstat *, u32, unsigned int);
                                              ^
./include/linux/fs.h:1855:46: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is
probably not what you want
./include/linux/fs.h: In function â__mandatory_lockâ:
./include/linux/fs.h:2325:25: error: âS_ISGIDâ undeclared (first use in this function)
  return (ino->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == S_ISGID;
                         ^
./include/linux/fs.h:2325:35: error: âS_IXGRPâ undeclared (first use in this function)
  return (ino->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == S_ISGID;
                                   ^
./include/linux/fs.h: In function âinvalidate_remote_inodeâ:
./include/linux/fs.h:2588:6: error: implicit declaration of function âS_ISREGâ
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
      ^
./include/linux/fs.h:2588:32: error: implicit declaration of function âS_ISDIRâ
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ||
                                ^
./include/linux/fs.h:2589:6: error: implicit declaration of function âS_ISLNKâ
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
      S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
      ^
./include/linux/fs.h: In function âexecute_okâ:
./include/linux/fs.h:2768:26: error: âS_IXUGOâ undeclared (first use in this function)
  return (inode->i_mode & S_IXUGO) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode);

Thanks,
Shaokun

å 2020/7/30 19:46, Stephen Rothwell åé:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20200729:
> 
> My fixes tree contains:
> 
>   dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning")
> 
> Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I revertd a commit.
> 
> The vfs tree lost its build failure.
> 
> The printk tree lost its build failure.
> 
> The net-next tree lost its build failure.
> 
> The security tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
> 3 commits.
> 
> The iommu tree gained a conflict against the dma-mapping tree.
> 
> The tip tree still had its build failure for which I reverted a
> commit.
> 
> The vhost tree lost its build failure but gained more for which I applied
> a patch.
> 
> The hmm tree gained conflicts against the drm and kvm-ppc trees.
> 
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 11751
>  12254 files changed, 603002 insertions(+), 226737 deletions(-)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ).  If you
> are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
> to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
> old one.  You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new
> master.
> 
> You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
> file in the source.  There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log
> files in the Next directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built
> with a ppc64_defconfig for powerpc, an allmodconfig for x86_64, a
> multi_v7_defconfig for arm and a native build of tools/perf. After
> the final fixups (if any), I do an x86_64 modules_install followed by
> builds for x86_64 allnoconfig, powerpc allnoconfig (32 and 64 bit),
> ppc44x_defconfig, allyesconfig and pseries_le_defconfig and i386, sparc
> and sparc64 defconfig and htmldocs. And finally, a simple boot test
> of the powerpc pseries_le_defconfig kernel in qemu (with and without
> kvm enabled).
> 
> Below is a summary of the state of the merge.
> 
> I am currently merging 328 trees (counting Linus' and 85 trees of bug
> fix patches pending for the current merge release).
> 
> Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at
> http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html .
> 
> Status of my local build tests will be at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next .  If maintainers want to give
> advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
> more builds.
> 
> Thanks to Randy Dunlap for doing many randconfig builds.  And to Paul
> Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes.
>