Re: [PATCH 0/2] locking/qspinlock: Break qspinlock_types.h header loop

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:51 AM Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:47:16AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > We may ask Synopsys folks to look at this as well.
> > Vineet, any ideas if we may unify ATOMIC64_INIT() across the architectures?
>
> I don't think there is any technical difficulty.  The custom
> atomic64_t simply adds an alignment requirement so the initialisor
> remains the same.
>
> I just didn't want to add more complexity to the existing patch.
> As a follow-up patch it should be quite straightforward.

Ah, I see what you mean. I considered the follow up patch as well, I
thought there were some bigger impediments.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko