Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: SVM: Change intercept_dr to generic intercepts

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 29/07/20 01:59, Jim Mattson wrote:
>>         case SVM_EXIT_READ_DR0 ... SVM_EXIT_WRITE_DR7: {
>> -               u32 bit = 1U << (exit_code - SVM_EXIT_READ_DR0);
>> -               if (svm->nested.ctl.intercept_dr & bit)
>> +               if (__is_intercept(&svm->nested.ctl.intercepts, exit_code))
> Can I assume that all of these __<function> calls will become
> <function> calls when the grand unification is done? (Maybe I should
> just look ahead.)
> 

The <function> calls are reserved for the active VMCB while these take a
vector.  Probably it would be nicer to call them
vmcb_{set,clr,is}_intercept and make them take a struct
vmcb_control_area*, but apart from that the concept is fine

Once we do the vmcb01/vmcb02/vmcb12 work, there will not be anymore
&svm->nested.ctl (replaced by &svm->nested.vmcb12->ctl) and we will be
able to change them to take a struct vmcb*.  Then is_intercept would for
example be simply:

	return vmcb_is_intercept(svm->vmcb, nr);

as expected.

Paolo