Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] MIPS: ingenic: Enable JZ4780_NEMC manually

[Thomas Bogendoerfer]

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:53:08PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:51:23PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Le mar. 28 juil. 2020 à 14:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit
> > :
> > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:37:02PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > > >  On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:19:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > >  > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:12:11PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > > >  > > Hi Krzysztof,
> > > >  > >
> > > >  > > Le mar. 28 juil. 2020 à 12:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > > > <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit
> > > >  > > :
> > > >  > > > The CONFIG_JZ4780_NEMC was previously a default on MIPS but
> > > > now it has
> > > >  > > > to be enabled manually.
> > > >  > > >
> > > >  > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >  > >
> > > >  > > I think you should swap the two so that there are no problems
> > > > when
> > > >  > > bisecting.
> > > >  >
> > > >  > Good point. I was thinking that it will go via some of MIPS trees
> > > > and
> > > >  > the patch #1 will just wait a cycle.  However with acks, I can
> > > > take it
> > > >  > through drivers/memory tree.
> > > > 
> > > >  I've acked the patch.
> > > > 
> > > >  Thomas.
> > > 
> > > Thanks but now I noticed that one of changed configs
> > > (arch/mips/configs/rs90_defconfig) is only in MIPS tree.
> > > 
> > > I think it is easier then to take the patch #2 (configs) via MIPS and
> > > wait with #1 for the next cycle or also take it via MIPS if it applies
> > > cleanly.
> > 
> > Why not take them both in the MIPS tree then? Would that conflict with
> > changes in your tree?
> 
> Exactly (last part of my sentence). There should be no conflicts.

I've applied both patches to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]