Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 28/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs

From: Song Liu
Date: Tue Jul 28 2020 - 01:56:12 EST

Next message: Andrii Nakryiko: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer"
Previous message: Randy Dunlap: "[PATCH -mmotm] pinctrl: mediatek: fix build for tristate changes"
In reply to: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH bpf-next v2 28/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs"
Next in thread: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH bpf-next v2 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:21 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs. It has been
> replaced with memcg-based memory accounting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@xxxxxx>

Next message: Andrii Nakryiko: "Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer"
Previous message: Randy Dunlap: "[PATCH -mmotm] pinctrl: mediatek: fix build for tristate changes"
In reply to: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH bpf-next v2 28/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs"
Next in thread: Roman Gushchin: "[PATCH bpf-next v2 22/35] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]