Re: [net-next v3 5/6] net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver implementation

From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Sun Jul 26 2020 - 04:34:19 EST


Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 05:06:50PM CEST, vadym.kochan@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>The following features are supported:
>
> - VLAN-aware bridge offloading
> - VLAN-unaware bridge offloading
> - FDB offloading (learning, ageing)
> - Switchport configuration
>
>Currently there are some limitations like:
>
> - Only 1 VLAN-aware bridge instance supported
> - FDB ageing timeout parameter is set globally per device
>
>Signed-off-by: Serhiy Boiko <serhiy.boiko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Signed-off-by: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>---

[...]


>+static void prestera_fdb_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
>+{
>+ struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info *fdb_info;
>+ struct prestera_fdb_event_work *swdev_work;
>+ struct prestera_port *port;
>+ struct net_device *dev;
>+ int err = 0;
>+
>+ swdev_work = container_of(work, struct prestera_fdb_event_work, work);
>+ dev = swdev_work->dev;
>+
>+ rtnl_lock();
>+
>+ port = prestera_port_dev_lower_find(dev);
>+ if (!port)
>+ goto out;
>+
>+ switch (swdev_work->event) {
>+ case SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE:
>+ fdb_info = &swdev_work->fdb_info;
>+ if (!fdb_info->added_by_user)
>+ break;
>+
>+ err = prestera_port_fdb_set(port, fdb_info, true);
>+ if (err)
>+ break;
>+
>+ prestera_fdb_offload_notify(port, fdb_info);
>+ break;
>+
>+ case SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE:
>+ fdb_info = &swdev_work->fdb_info;
>+ prestera_port_fdb_set(port, fdb_info, false);
>+ break;
>+ }
>+
>+out:
>+ rtnl_unlock();
>+
>+ kfree(swdev_work->fdb_info.addr);
>+ kfree(swdev_work);
>+ dev_put(dev);
>+}
>+
>+static int prestera_switchdev_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
>+ unsigned long event, void *ptr)
>+{
>+ struct net_device *dev = switchdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr);
>+ struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info *fdb_info;
>+ struct switchdev_notifier_info *info = ptr;
>+ struct prestera_fdb_event_work *swdev_work;
>+ struct net_device *upper;
>+ int err = 0;
>+
>+ if (event == SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET) {
>+ err = switchdev_handle_port_attr_set(dev, ptr,
>+ prestera_netdev_check,
>+ prestera_port_obj_attr_set);
>+ return notifier_from_errno(err);
>+ }
>+
>+ upper = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(dev);
>+ if (!upper)
>+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
>+
>+ if (!netif_is_bridge_master(upper))
>+ return NOTIFY_DONE;

Okay, you support upper bridge. Of which interface? I believe you should
put prestera_netdev_check(dev) check here and avoid the lookup in the
work. Otherwise any chain of intermediate lower devices would be
supported, which is wrong.


>+
>+ swdev_work = kzalloc(sizeof(*swdev_work), GFP_ATOMIC);
>+ if (!swdev_work)
>+ return NOTIFY_BAD;
>+
>+ swdev_work->event = event;
>+ swdev_work->dev = dev;
>+
>+ switch (event) {
>+ case SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE:
>+ case SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE:
>+ fdb_info = container_of(info,
>+ struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info,
>+ info);
>+
>+ INIT_WORK(&swdev_work->work, prestera_fdb_event_work);
>+ memcpy(&swdev_work->fdb_info, ptr,
>+ sizeof(swdev_work->fdb_info));
>+
>+ swdev_work->fdb_info.addr = kzalloc(ETH_ALEN, GFP_ATOMIC);
>+ if (!swdev_work->fdb_info.addr)
>+ goto out;
>+
>+ ether_addr_copy((u8 *)swdev_work->fdb_info.addr,
>+ fdb_info->addr);
>+ dev_hold(dev);
>+
>+ break;
>+
>+ default:
>+ kfree(swdev_work);
>+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
>+ }
>+
>+ queue_work(swdev_wq, &swdev_work->work);
>+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
>+out:
>+ kfree(swdev_work);
>+ return NOTIFY_BAD;
>+}

[...]