Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] powerpc/smp: Generalize 2nd sched domain

From: peterz
Date: Wed Jul 22 2020 - 04:54:21 EST

Next message: benbjiang(蒋彪): "Re: [RFC PATCH 11/16] sched: migration changes for core scheduling(Internet mail)"
Previous message: qiang.zhang: "[PATCH] mm/dmapool.c: add lock protect in dma_pool_destroy"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] powerpc/smp: Generalize 2nd sched domain"
Next in thread: Srikar Dronamraju: "[PATCH v2 07/10] Powerpc/numa: Detect support for coregroup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:48:54AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But reading your explanation, it looks like the Linux topology setup
> could actually unravel the fused-faux-SMT8 into two independent SMT4
> parts, negating that firmware option.

Ah, it looks like that's exactly what you're doing. Nice!

Next message: benbjiang(蒋彪): "Re: [RFC PATCH 11/16] sched: migration changes for core scheduling(Internet mail)"
Previous message: qiang.zhang: "[PATCH] mm/dmapool.c: add lock protect in dma_pool_destroy"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] powerpc/smp: Generalize 2nd sched domain"
Next in thread: Srikar Dronamraju: "[PATCH v2 07/10] Powerpc/numa: Detect support for coregroup"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]