Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v1] usbhid: Fix slab-out-of-bounds write in hiddev_ioctl_usage()

[Dan Carpenter]

The problem is there is another bug on the lines before...

drivers/hid/usbhid/hiddev.c
   475          default:
   476                  if (cmd != HIDIOCGUSAGE &&
   477                      cmd != HIDIOCGUSAGES &&
   478                      uref->report_type == HID_REPORT_TYPE_INPUT)
   479                          goto inval;
   480  
   481                  if (uref->report_id == HID_REPORT_ID_UNKNOWN) {
   482                          field = hiddev_lookup_usage(hid, uref);

This code is obviously buggy because syzkaller triggers an Oops and it's
pretty complicated to review (meaning that you have to jump around to a
lot of different places instead of just reading it from top to bottom
as static analysis would).

The user controlls "uref->report_id".  If hiddev_lookup_usage() finds
something we know that uref->usage_index is a valid offset into the
field->usage[] array but it might be too large for the field->value[]
array.

   483                          if (field == NULL)
   484                                  goto inval;
   485                  } else {
   486                          rinfo.report_type = uref->report_type;
   487                          rinfo.report_id = uref->report_id;
   488                          if ((report = hiddev_lookup_report(hid, &rinfo)) == NULL)
   489                                  goto inval;
   490  
   491                          if (uref->field_index >= report->maxfield)
   492                                  goto inval;
   493                          uref->field_index = array_index_nospec(uref->field_index,
   494                                                                 report->maxfield);
   495  
   496                          field = report->field[uref->field_index];
   497  
   498                          if (cmd == HIDIOCGCOLLECTIONINDEX) {
   499                                  if (uref->usage_index >= field->maxusage)
   500                                          goto inval;
   501                                  uref->usage_index =
   502                                          array_index_nospec(uref->usage_index,
   503                                                             field->maxusage);
   504                          } else if (uref->usage_index >= field->report_count)
   505                                  goto inval;
   506                  }
   507  
   508                  if (cmd == HIDIOCGUSAGES || cmd == HIDIOCSUSAGES) {
   509                          if (uref_multi->num_values > HID_MAX_MULTI_USAGES ||
   510                              uref->usage_index + uref_multi->num_values >
   511                              field->report_count)
   512                                  goto inval;
   513  
   514                          uref->usage_index =
   515                                  array_index_nospec(uref->usage_index,
   516                                                     field->report_count -
   517                                                     uref_multi->num_values);

We check that it is a valid offset into the ->value[] array for these
two ioctl cmds.

   518                  }
   519  
   520                  switch (cmd) {
   521                  case HIDIOCGUSAGE:
   522                          uref->value = field->value[uref->usage_index];
                                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Not checked.

   523                          if (copy_to_user(user_arg, uref, sizeof(*uref)))
   524                                  goto fault;
   525                          goto goodreturn;
   526  
   527                  case HIDIOCSUSAGE:
   528                          field->value[uref->usage_index] = uref->value;
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This one you fixed.

   529                          goto goodreturn;
   530  
   531                  case HIDIOCGCOLLECTIONINDEX:
   532                          i = field->usage[uref->usage_index].collection_index;
   533                          kfree(uref_multi);
   534                          return i;
   535                  case HIDIOCGUSAGES:
   536                          for (i = 0; i < uref_multi->num_values; i++)
   537                                  uref_multi->values[i] =
   538                                      field->value[uref->usage_index + i];

fine.

   539                          if (copy_to_user(user_arg, uref_multi,
   540                                           sizeof(*uref_multi)))
   541                                  goto fault;
   542                          goto goodreturn;
   543                  case HIDIOCSUSAGES:
   544                          for (i = 0; i < uref_multi->num_values; i++)
   545                                  field->value[uref->usage_index + i] =

also fine.

   546                                      uref_multi->values[i];
   547                          goto goodreturn;
   548                  }
   549  
   550  goodreturn:
   551                  kfree(uref_multi);
   552                  return 0;
   553  fault:
   554                  kfree(uref_multi);
   555                  return -EFAULT;
   556  inval:
   557                  kfree(uref_multi);
   558                  return -EINVAL;
   559          }
   560  }

So another option would be to just add HIDIOCGUSAGE and HIDIOCSUSAGE to
the earlier check.  That risks breaking userspace.  Another option is to
just add a check like you did earlier to the HIDIOCGUSAGE case.
Probably just do option #2 and resend.

regards,
dan carpenter