Re: [PATCH] genirq/affinity: Handle affinity setting on inactive interrupts correctly

[Thomas Gleixner]

Ali,

"Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

can you pretty please fix your mail setup. Your replies lack the
following headers:

  In-Reply-To:
  References:

but carry some useless Microsoft gunk instead:

  Thread-Topic: [PATCH] genirq/affinity: Handle affinity setting on inactive
    interrupts correctly
  Thread-Index: AQHWXE5yOF+Kj67jZUWJl7gBhLLD9A==

which is non RFC and not documented. Evolution has some magic hack to
decode this mess, but all mail readers which rely on the documented RFC
fields including archives:

  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/BBA90891-8A4A-4A39-BF51-13EECDE414F1@xxxxxxxxxx/

fail to properly thread your mails. That sucks.

> Tested on an arm64 system that originally experienced the issue and couldn't reproduce it with this patch.
> Tested-by: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@xxxxxxxxxx>

Nevertheless, thanks for confirming that it solves the problem :)

       tglx