Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Add MBA log extraction support

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Thu 16 Jul 22:22 PDT 2020, Sibi Sankar wrote:

> On 2020-07-17 10:27, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 16 Jul 05:36 PDT 2020, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > 
> > > On SC7180 the MBA firmware stores the bootup text logs in a 4K segment
> > > at the beginning of the MBA region. Add support to extract the logs
> > > which will be useful to debug mba boot/authentication issues.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 41
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> > > b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> > > index 95e21ed607cb9..4ddf084b2c6fc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > > 
> > >  #include <linux/clk.h>
> > >  #include <linux/delay.h>
> > > +#include <linux/devcoredump.h>
> > >  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > @@ -37,6 +38,8 @@
> > > 
> > >  #define MPSS_CRASH_REASON_SMEM		421
> > > 
> > > +#define MBA_LOG_SIZE			SZ_4K
> > > +
> > >  /* RMB Status Register Values */
> > >  #define RMB_PBL_SUCCESS			0x1
> > > 
> > > @@ -139,6 +142,7 @@ struct rproc_hexagon_res {
> > >  	int version;
> > >  	bool need_mem_protection;
> > >  	bool has_alt_reset;
> > > +	bool has_mba_logs;
> > >  	bool has_spare_reg;
> > >  };
> > > 
> > > @@ -200,6 +204,7 @@ struct q6v5 {
> > >  	struct qcom_sysmon *sysmon;
> > >  	bool need_mem_protection;
> > >  	bool has_alt_reset;
> > > +	bool has_mba_logs;
> > >  	bool has_spare_reg;
> > >  	int mpss_perm;
> > >  	int mba_perm;
> > > @@ -518,6 +523,19 @@ static int q6v5_rmb_mba_wait(struct q6v5
> > > *qproc, u32 status, int ms)
> > >  	return val;
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > +static void q6v5_dump_mba_logs(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct rproc *rproc = qproc->rproc;
> > > +	void *data;
> > > +
> > > +	data = vmalloc(MBA_LOG_SIZE);
> > > +	if (!data)
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	memcpy(data, qproc->mba_region, MBA_LOG_SIZE);
> > > +	dev_coredumpv(&rproc->dev, data, MBA_LOG_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> > >  {
> > >  	u32 val;
> > > @@ -838,6 +856,7 @@ static int q6v5_mba_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> > >  {
> > >  	int ret;
> > >  	int xfermemop_ret;
> > > +	bool mba_load_err = false;
> > > 
> > >  	qcom_q6v5_prepare(&qproc->q6v5);
> > > 
> > > @@ -931,7 +950,7 @@ static int q6v5_mba_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> > >  	q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_q6);
> > >  	q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_modem);
> > >  	q6v5proc_halt_axi_port(qproc, qproc->halt_map, qproc->halt_nc);
> > > -
> > > +	mba_load_err = true;
> > >  reclaim_mba:
> > >  	xfermemop_ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &qproc->mba_perm,
> > > true,
> > >  						false, qproc->mba_phys,
> > > @@ -939,6 +958,8 @@ static int q6v5_mba_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> > >  	if (xfermemop_ret) {
> > >  		dev_err(qproc->dev,
> > >  			"Failed to reclaim mba buffer, system may become unstable\n");
> > > +	} else if (qproc->has_mba_logs & mba_load_err) {
> > > +		q6v5_dump_mba_logs(qproc);
> > >  	}
> > > 
> > >  disable_active_clks:
> > > @@ -968,7 +989,7 @@ static int q6v5_mba_load(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > -static void q6v5_mba_reclaim(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> > > +static void q6v5_mba_reclaim(struct q6v5 *qproc, bool err_path)
> > >  {
> > >  	int ret;
> > >  	u32 val;
> > > @@ -1006,6 +1027,9 @@ static void q6v5_mba_reclaim(struct q6v5 *qproc)
> > >  				      qproc->mba_size);
> > >  	WARN_ON(ret);
> > > 
> > > +	if (qproc->has_mba_logs && err_path && !ret)
> > 
> > Wouldn't it be possible to just call q6v5_dump_mba_logs() directly after
> > the return from q6v5_mba_reclaim()? That way we can avoid passing the
> > bool to indicate if the reclaim should also dump some stuff.
> > 
> > Sure we don't have a way to tell if the assign_mem failed, but we're
> > going to crash shortly anyways (which is something we should change).
> 
> We wont crash as long as we dont touch
> the mba region though. Trying a mba
> logs dump in such a case will ensure
> that we crash lol.
> 

Right, but that means that if we ever try to start the remoteproc again
it will crash on us.

So what I meant at the end there is that we should either have a
mechanism to ensure that no further accesses are attempted (e.g.
prohibit a subsequent "start") or this might actually be a valid case
for a BUG_ON().

Regards,
Bjorn

> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I think you should move the has_mba_logs into q6v5_dump_mba_logs(),
> > making it cause an early return.
> 
> cool sure I'll do that.
> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> > 
> > > +		q6v5_dump_mba_logs(qproc);
> > > +
> > >  	ret = qcom_q6v5_unprepare(&qproc->q6v5);
> > >  	if (ret) {
> > >  		q6v5_pds_disable(qproc, qproc->proxy_pds,
> > > @@ -1255,7 +1279,7 @@ static void qcom_q6v5_dump_segment(struct
> > > rproc *rproc,
> > >  						false, true,
> > >  						qproc->mpss_phys,
> > >  						qproc->mpss_size);
> > > -			q6v5_mba_reclaim(qproc);
> > > +			q6v5_mba_reclaim(qproc, false);
> > >  		}
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1297,7 +1321,7 @@ static int q6v5_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> > >  	return 0;
> > > 
> > >  reclaim_mpss:
> > > -	q6v5_mba_reclaim(qproc);
> > > +	q6v5_mba_reclaim(qproc, true);
> > > 
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1313,7 +1337,7 @@ static int q6v5_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> > >  	if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> > >  		dev_err(qproc->dev, "timed out on wait\n");
> > > 
> > > -	q6v5_mba_reclaim(qproc);
> > > +	q6v5_mba_reclaim(qproc, false);
> > > 
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1717,6 +1741,7 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > > 
> > >  	qproc->version = desc->version;
> > >  	qproc->need_mem_protection = desc->need_mem_protection;
> > > +	qproc->has_mba_logs = desc->has_mba_logs;
> > > 
> > >  	ret = qcom_q6v5_init(&qproc->q6v5, pdev, rproc,
> > > MPSS_CRASH_REASON_SMEM,
> > >  			     qcom_msa_handover);
> > > @@ -1808,6 +1833,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res
> > > sc7180_mss = {
> > >  	},
> > >  	.need_mem_protection = true,
> > >  	.has_alt_reset = false,
> > > +	.has_mba_logs = true,
> > >  	.has_spare_reg = true,
> > >  	.version = MSS_SC7180,
> > >  };
> > > @@ -1843,6 +1869,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res
> > > sdm845_mss = {
> > >  	},
> > >  	.need_mem_protection = true,
> > >  	.has_alt_reset = true,
> > > +	.has_mba_logs = true,
> > >  	.has_spare_reg = false,
> > >  	.version = MSS_SDM845,
> > >  };
> > > @@ -1870,6 +1897,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res
> > > msm8998_mss = {
> > >  	},
> > >  	.need_mem_protection = true,
> > >  	.has_alt_reset = false,
> > > +	.has_mba_logs = false,
> > >  	.has_spare_reg = false,
> > >  	.version = MSS_MSM8998,
> > >  };
> > > @@ -1900,6 +1928,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res
> > > msm8996_mss = {
> > >  	},
> > >  	.need_mem_protection = true,
> > >  	.has_alt_reset = false,
> > > +	.has_mba_logs = false,
> > >  	.has_spare_reg = false,
> > >  	.version = MSS_MSM8996,
> > >  };
> > > @@ -1933,6 +1962,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res
> > > msm8916_mss = {
> > >  	},
> > >  	.need_mem_protection = false,
> > >  	.has_alt_reset = false,
> > > +	.has_mba_logs = false,
> > >  	.has_spare_reg = false,
> > >  	.version = MSS_MSM8916,
> > >  };
> > > @@ -1974,6 +2004,7 @@ static const struct rproc_hexagon_res
> > > msm8974_mss = {
> > >  	},
> > >  	.need_mem_protection = false,
> > >  	.has_alt_reset = false,
> > > +	.has_mba_logs = false,
> > >  	.has_spare_reg = false,
> > >  	.version = MSS_MSM8974,
> > >  };
> > > --
> > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
> > > Forum,
> > > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.