Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] Fix undefined operation fault that can hang a cpu on crash or panic

From: David P. Reed
Date: Sun Jul 05 2020 - 15:52:12 EST


Thanks, will handle these. 2 questions below.

On Sunday, July 5, 2020 2:22pm, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> said:

> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:38 PM David P. Reed <dpreed@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Fix: Mask undefined operation fault during emergency VMXOFF that must be
>> attempted to force cpu exit from VMX root operation.
>> Explanation: When a cpu may be in VMX root operation (only possible when
>> CR4.VMXE is set), crash or panic reboot tries to exit VMX root operation
>> using VMXOFF. This is necessary, because any INIT will be masked while cpu
>> is in VMX root operation, but that state cannot be reliably
>> discerned by the state of the cpu.
>> VMXOFF faults if the cpu is not actually in VMX root operation, signalling
>> undefined operation.
>> Discovered while debugging an out-of-tree x-visor with a race. Can happen
>> due to certain kinds of bugs in KVM.
>
> Can you re-wrap lines to 68 characters? Also, the Fix: and

I used 'scripts/checkpatch.pl' and it had me wrap to 75 chars:
"WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)"

Should I submit a fix to checkpatch.pl to say 68?

> Explanation: is probably unnecessary. You could say:
>
> Ignore a potential #UD failut during emergency VMXOFF ...
>
> When a cpu may be in VMX ...
>
>>
>> Fixes: 208067 <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208067>
>> Reported-by: David P. Reed <dpreed@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> It's not really necessary to say that you, the author, reported the
> problem, but I guess it's harmless.
>
>> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: David P. Reed <dpreed@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/virtext.h | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/virtext.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/virtext.h
>> index 0ede8d04535a..0e0900eacb9c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/virtext.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/virtext.h
>> @@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ static inline int cpu_has_vmx(void)
>> }
>>
>>
>> -/* Disable VMX on the current CPU
>> +/* Exit VMX root mode and isable VMX on the current CPU.
>
> s/isable/disable/
>
>
>> /* Disable VMX if it is supported and enabled on the current CPU
>> --
>> 2.26.2
>>
>
> Other than that:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>

As a newbie, I have a process question - should I resend the patch with the 'Reviewed-by' line, as well as correcting the other wording? Thanks!

>
> --Andy
>