Re: [PATCH v4 02/14] irqchip/csky-apb-intc: Fix potential resource leaks

[Tiezhu Yang]

On 07/02/2020 04:05 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> On 07/02/2020 03:19 PM, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-csky-apb-intc.c
> > â
> > > > I suggest to recheck the parameter alignment for such a function call.
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=7c30b859a947535f2213277e827d7ac7dcff9c84#n93 
> > > OK, thank you, like this:
> > >
> > > -       ret = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(root_domain, 32, 1,
> > > -                       "csky_intc", handle_level_irq,
> > > -                       IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN, 
> > > 0, 0);
> > > -       if (ret) {
> > > +       if (irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(root_domain, 32, 1,
> > > +                                          "csky_intc", 
> > > handle_level_irq,
> > > +                                          IRQ_NOREQUEST | 
> > > IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN, 0, 0)) {
> > >                  pr_err("C-SKY Intc irq_alloc_gc failed.\n");
> > â
> >
> > Would you like to use also horizontal tab characters for the 
> > corresponding indentation?
>
> Sorry, I do not quite understanding what you mean, maybe like this?
>
>         if (irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(root_domain, 32, 1,
>                 "csky_intc", handle_level_irq,
>                 IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN, 0, 0)) {
>                 pr_err("C-SKY Intc irq_alloc_gc failed.\n");
>                 goto err_domain_remove;
>         }

Hi Markus,

Thank you very much for your review and suggestion.

Maybe still use "ret" variable is better, the following is another comment
which is only sent to me:

[I think that if one of the return values comes from a function call, then
you should use the value from the function call even if it is currently
always -ENOMEM.  The return value of the function call could perhaps
change in the future.

In any case, ret = foo(); if (ret) is very common in kernel code, and
there is no reason not to do it, especially when the function call takes
up a lot of space.]

Let us keep it as it is to make the code clear and to avoid the 
alignment issue:

ret = foo();
if (ret) {
        ret = -ENOMEM;
        goto ...
}

Thanks,
Tiezhu

> > Regards,
> > Markus