Re: RFC: a failing pm_runtime_get increases the refcnt?

[Wolfram Sang]

> However, that probably means that for most patches I am getting, the
> better fix would be to remove the error checking? (I assume most people
> put the error check in there to be on the "safe side" without having a
> real argument to really do it.)

Kindly asking for more input here: A better answer to all these patches
is to ask if the error checking could not be removed instead?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature