Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: add GPO driver for PCA9570

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Thu Jun 25 2020 - 04:59:26 EST


On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:59 AM Sungbo Eo <mans0n@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> NXP PCA9570 is 4-bit I2C GPO expander without interrupt functionality.
> Its ports are controlled only by a data byte without register address.
>
> As there is no other driver similar enough to be adapted for it, a new
> driver is introduced here.

Thanks for an update. I'll look at them later, so please defer the
next version a bit (perhaps for one week).
My comments below.

...

> +static void pca9570_set_mask_bits(struct gpio_chip *chip, u8 mask, u8 bits)
> +{
> + struct pca9570 *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> + u8 buffer;
> + int err;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&gpio->lock);

> + buffer = gpio->buffer & ~mask;
> + buffer |= (mask & bits);

Usual pattern is to put this on one line

buffer = (gpio->buffer & ~mask) | (bits & mask);

> + err = i2c_smbus_write_byte(gpio->client, buffer);

> + if (!err)
> + gpio->buffer = buffer;

I'm not sure I understand why this is under lock.

> +
> + mutex_unlock(&gpio->lock);

Can't you simple do it here like

if (err)
return;

... = buffer;

?

> +}

...

> +static int pca9570_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)

Can't you use ->probe_new() instead?

> +{
> + struct pca9570 *gpio;
> + int ret;
> +
> + gpio = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!gpio)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +

> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, gpio);

Either move this before return 0; or...

> + gpio->chip = template_chip;
> + gpio->chip.parent = &client->dev;
> +
> + gpio->client = client;
> +
> + mutex_init(&gpio->lock);
> +
> + ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&client->dev, &gpio->chip, gpio);

> + if (ret < 0) {

(What is the meaning of ' < 0' ?

> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to register gpiochip\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;

...simple return devm_...(...);

> +}

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko