Re: [PATCH 10/22] gpiolib: cdev: fix minor race in GET_LINEINFO_WATCH

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Wed Jun 24 2020 - 10:46:52 EST


On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 7:03 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Merge separate usage of test_bit/set_bit into test_and_set_bit to remove
> the possibility of a race between the test and set.
>
> Similarly test_bit and clear_bit.
>
> In the existing code it is possible for two threads to race past the
> test_bit and then set or clear the watch bit, and neither return EBUSY.

I stumbled over this myself, but...

> - if (test_bit(hwgpio, gcdev->watched_lines))
> + if (test_and_set_bit(hwgpio, gcdev->watched_lines))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> gpio_desc_to_lineinfo(desc, &lineinfo);
> @@ -897,7 +897,6 @@ static long gpio_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> if (copy_to_user(ip, &lineinfo, sizeof(lineinfo)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - set_bit(hwgpio, gcdev->watched_lines);
> return 0;

...I think it's not an equivalent despite races involved. If you set
bit and return error code, you will have the wrong state.

...

> - if (!test_bit(hwgpio, gcdev->watched_lines))
> + if (!test_and_clear_bit(hwgpio, gcdev->watched_lines))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> - clear_bit(hwgpio, gcdev->watched_lines);
> return 0;

OTOH, this is okay as long as we have no code in between. So, I really
prefer something better to do such checks.
(Alas, I can't come up with a proposal right now)

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko