Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: stm32-dmamux: Fix pm_runtime_get_sync() failure cases

From: Markus Elfring
Date: Thu Jun 04 2020 - 05:37:23 EST

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: Move instrumentation_begin()/end() into new <linux/instrumentation.h> header"
Previous message: Mike Rapoport: "[PATCH] softirq: don't call lockdep_hardirq_exit() twice"
In reply to: Markus Elfring: "Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: stm32-dma: call pm_runtime_put if pm_runtime_get_sync fails"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: stm32-mdma: call pm_runtime_put if pm_runtime_get_sync fails"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Please stop proposing rewording on my patches!

I find it interesting that you got into the mood to choose
another patch subject variant.
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1252131/
https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20200603193648.19190-1-navid.emamdoost@xxxxxxxxx/

> I will consider updating my patches only if a maintainer asks for it.

Now I am curious if you would like take my patch review request into account
to avoid a typo there.
How will the quality evolve for such commit messages?

Regards,
Markus

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: Move instrumentation_begin()/end() into new <linux/instrumentation.h> header"
Previous message: Mike Rapoport: "[PATCH] softirq: don't call lockdep_hardirq_exit() twice"
In reply to: Markus Elfring: "Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: stm32-dma: call pm_runtime_put if pm_runtime_get_sync fails"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: stm32-mdma: call pm_runtime_put if pm_runtime_get_sync fails"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]