Re: [PATCH 04/19] perf ftrace: add support for tracing option 'func_stack_trace'

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Wed May 20 2020 - 16:58:08 EST


Em Sun, May 10, 2020 at 11:06:13PM +0800, Changbin Du escreveu:
> This adds support to display call trace for function tracer. To do this,
> just specify a '-s' option.
>
> $ sudo perf ftrace -T vfs_read -s
> iio-sensor-prox-855 [003] 6168.369657: vfs_read <-ksys_read
> iio-sensor-prox-855 [003] 6168.369677: <stack trace>
> => vfs_read
> => ksys_read
> => __x64_sys_read
> => do_syscall_64
> => entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
> ...

So, for the reason stated in my response to the patch 03/19, I think we
should start here with --call-graph for this, instead of
--func-stack-trace. And for now don't provide a one-letter equivalent.

- Arnaldo

> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> index 57e656c35d28..1d30c2d5f88b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct perf_ftrace {
> struct list_head graph_funcs;
> struct list_head nograph_funcs;
> int graph_depth;
> + bool func_stack_trace;
> };
>
> struct filter_entry {
> @@ -128,9 +129,27 @@ static int append_tracing_file(const char *name, const char *val)
> return __write_tracing_file(name, val, true);
> }
>
> +static int write_tracing_option_file(const char *name, const char *val)
> +{
> + char *file;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (asprintf(&file, "options/%s", name) < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + ret = __write_tracing_file(file, val, false);
> + free(file);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int reset_tracing_cpu(void);
> static void reset_tracing_filters(void);
>
> +static void reset_tracing_options(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace __maybe_unused)
> +{
> + write_tracing_option_file("func_stack_trace", "0");
> +}
> +
> static int reset_tracing_files(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace __maybe_unused)
> {
> if (write_tracing_file("tracing_on", "0") < 0)
> @@ -149,6 +168,7 @@ static int reset_tracing_files(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace __maybe_unused)
> return -1;
>
> reset_tracing_filters();
> + reset_tracing_options(ftrace);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -204,6 +224,17 @@ static int set_tracing_cpu(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace)
> return set_tracing_cpumask(cpumap);
> }
>
> +static int set_tracing_func_stack_trace(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace)
> +{
> + if (!ftrace->func_stack_trace)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (write_tracing_option_file("func_stack_trace", "1") < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int reset_tracing_cpu(void)
> {
> struct perf_cpu_map *cpumap = perf_cpu_map__new(NULL);
> @@ -326,6 +357,11 @@ static int __cmd_ftrace(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace, int argc, const char **argv)
> goto out_reset;
> }
>
> + if (set_tracing_func_stack_trace(ftrace) < 0) {
> + pr_err("failed to set tracing option func_stack_trace\n");
> + goto out_reset;
> + }
> +
> if (set_tracing_filters(ftrace) < 0) {
> pr_err("failed to set tracing filters\n");
> goto out_reset;
> @@ -459,6 +495,8 @@ int cmd_ftrace(int argc, const char **argv)
> "trace given functions only", parse_filter_func),
> OPT_CALLBACK('N', "notrace-funcs", &ftrace.notrace, "func",
> "do not trace given functions", parse_filter_func),
> + OPT_BOOLEAN('s', "func-stack-trace", &ftrace.func_stack_trace,
> + "Show kernel stack trace for function tracer"),
> OPT_CALLBACK_DEFAULT('G', "graph-funcs", &ftrace.graph_funcs, "func",
> "Set graph filter on given functions (imply to use function_graph tracer)",
> parse_filter_func, "*"),
> --
> 2.25.1
>

--

- Arnaldo