Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Enable compilation of objtool for all architectures

[Josh Poimboeuf]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 01:55:33PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> +const char __attribute__ ((weak)) *objname;
> +
> +int missing_check(const char *_objname, bool orc)
> +{
> +	return 127;
> +}
> +
> +int __attribute__ ((weak, alias("missing_check"))) check(const char *_objname, bool orc);
> +
> +int missing_orc_dump(const char *_objname)
> +{
> +	return 127;
> +}
> +
> +int __attribute__ ((weak, alias("missing_orc_dump"))) orc_dump(const char *_objname);
> +
> +int __attribute__ ((weak)) create_orc(struct objtool_file *file)
> +{
> +	return 127;
> +}
> +
> +int __attribute__ ((weak)) create_orc_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
> +{
> +	return 127;
> +}

I think the aliased "missing_" functions are no longer needed, right?
i.e. can we just have weak versions of check() and orc_dump()?

Otherwise everything looks good to me.

-- 
Josh