Re: [PATCH crypto-stable v3 1/2] crypto: arch/lib - limit simd usage to 4k chunks

[Ard Biesheuvel]

On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 09:40, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 23/04/2020 Ã 09:18, Ard Biesheuvel a Ãcrit :
> > FYI: you shouldn't cc stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx directly on your patches,
> > or add the cc: line. Only patches that are already in Linus' tree
> > should be sent there.
> >
> > Also, the fixes tags are really quite sufficient. In fact, it is
> > actually rather difficult these days to prevent something from being
> > taken into -stable if the bots notice that it applies cleanly.
>
> According to Kernel Documentation,
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html :
>
>
> Patches that fix a severe bug in a released kernel should be directed
> toward the stable maintainers by putting a line like this:
>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> into the sign-off area of your patch (note, NOT an email recipient). You
> should also read Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst in
> addition to this file.
>
>
> Isn't it correct anymore ?
>

So this states clearly that you should not actually cc the patch to
stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, you should only add the cc: line to the commit
log area if it fixes a *severe* bug. Once the patch makes it into
Linus' tree, the cc: line will be used by the -stable maintainers to
locate the patch and pull it in.

But as I pointed out, even with just the fixes: tags, the patch will
be picked up by -stable anyway. Omitting the cc: line helps prevent
inadvertently sending the patch to stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx directly,
since git send-email typically honours Cc: lines in its input in its
default configuration.