Re: [PATCH 7/7] udf: stop using ioctl_by_bdev

From: Damien Le Moal
Date: Thu Apr 23 2020 - 03:43:11 EST


On 2020/04/23 16:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Instead just call the CD-ROM layer functionality directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/udf/lowlevel.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/udf/lowlevel.c b/fs/udf/lowlevel.c
> index 5c7ec121990d..f1094cdcd6cd 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/lowlevel.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/lowlevel.c
> @@ -27,41 +27,38 @@
>
> unsigned int udf_get_last_session(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> + struct cdrom_device_info *cdi = disk_to_cdi(sb->s_bdev->bd_disk);
> struct cdrom_multisession ms_info;
> - unsigned int vol_desc_start;
> - struct block_device *bdev = sb->s_bdev;
> - int i;
>
> - vol_desc_start = 0;
> - ms_info.addr_format = CDROM_LBA;
> - i = ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, CDROMMULTISESSION, (unsigned long)&ms_info);
> + if (!cdi) {
> + udf_debug("CDROMMULTISESSION not supported.\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> - if (i == 0) {
> + ms_info.addr_format = CDROM_LBA;
> + if (cdrom_multisession(cdi, &ms_info) == 0) {
> udf_debug("XA disk: %s, vol_desc_start=%d\n",
> ms_info.xa_flag ? "yes" : "no", ms_info.addr.lba);
> if (ms_info.xa_flag) /* necessary for a valid ms_info.addr */
> - vol_desc_start = ms_info.addr.lba;
> - } else {
> - udf_debug("CDROMMULTISESSION not supported: rc=%d\n", i);
> + return ms_info.addr.lba;
> }
> - return vol_desc_start;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> unsigned long udf_get_last_block(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct block_device *bdev = sb->s_bdev;
> + struct cdrom_device_info *cdi = disk_to_cdi(bdev->bd_disk);
> unsigned long lblock = 0;
>
> /*
> - * ioctl failed or returned obviously bogus value?
> + * The cdrom layer call failed or returned obviously bogus value?
> * Try using the device size...
> */
> - if (ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, CDROM_LAST_WRITTEN, (unsigned long) &lblock) ||
> - lblock == 0)
> + if (!cdi || cdrom_get_last_written(cdi, &lblock) || lblock == 0)
> lblock = i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode) >> sb->s_blocksize_bits;
>
> if (lblock)
> return lblock - 1;
> - else
> - return 0;
> + return 0;
> }
>

Looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx>

--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research