Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/reboot, efi: Use EFI reboot for Acer TravelMate X514-51T"

[Jian-Hong Pan]

Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> æ 2020å3æ16æ éä äå6:01åéï
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 05:17:56PM +0800, Jian-Hong Pan wrote:
> > But, that will raise another question:  Since the original quirk works
> > for all Acer X514-51T and the quirk cannot be removed for older BIOS.
> > Why not keep only original matching items for all Acer X514-51T
> > laptops?
>
> What does the "original matching items" mean?

I should make it more clearly.

The quirk's original matching items for Acer TravelMate X514-51T from
commit 0082517fa4bc ("x86/reboot, efi: Use EFI reboot for Acer
TravelMate X514-51T"):

        {       /* Handle reboot issue on Acer TravelMate X514-51T */
                .callback = set_efi_reboot,
                .ident = "Acer TravelMate X514-51T",
                .matches = {
                        DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Acer"),
                        DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "TravelMate X514-51T"),
                },
        },

These matching items make all Acer TravelMate X514-51Ts apply the quirk.

If BIOS version condition is added like:

        {       /* Handle reboot issue on Acer TravelMate X514-51T */
                .callback = set_efi_reboot,
                .ident = "Acer TravelMate X514-51T",
                .matches = {
                        DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Acer"),
                        DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "TravelMate X514-51T"),
                        DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VERSION, "V1.0"),
                },
        },

Then, only Acer TravelMate X514-51T with older BIOS (1.04 and before,
according BIOS version listed on Acer's website [1]) will apply the
quirk.
The one with newer BIOS's reboot type will be defined later by the codes.

[1] https://www.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/support-product/7889?b=1

> > I am not sure which option is better.  Any comment?
>
> If you mean, "let's not do anything and fix it only when there's really
> a need to fix anything", then yes, I agree.

Got it!

Thanks,
Jian-Hong Pan