Re: [RFC PATCH v5 0/5] Bluetooth: Handle system suspend gracefully

From: Marcel Holtmann
Date: Wed Mar 11 2020 - 11:03:17 EST


Hi Abhishek,

> This patch series prepares the Bluetooth controller for system suspend
> by disconnecting all devices and preparing the event filter and LE
> whitelist with devices that can wake the system from suspend.
>
> The main motivation for doing this is so we can enable Bluetooth as
> a wake up source during suspend without it being noisy. Bluetooth should
> wake the system when a HID device receives user input but otherwise not
> send any events to the host.
>
> This patch series was tested on several Chromebooks with both btusb and
> hci_serdev on kernel 4.19. The set of tests was basically the following:
> * Reconnects after suspend succeed
> * HID devices can wake the system from suspend (needs some related bluez
> changes to call the Set Wake Capable management command)
> * System properly pauses and unpauses discovery + advertising around
> suspend
> * System does not wake from any events from non wakeable devices
>
> Series 2 has refactored the change into multiple smaller commits as
> requested. I tried to simplify some of the whitelist filtering edge
> cases but unfortunately it remains quite complex.
>
> Series 3 has refactored it further and should have resolved the
> whitelisting complexity in series 2.
>
> Series 4 adds a fix to check for powered down and powering down adapters.
>
> Series 5 moves set_wake_capable to the last patch in the series and
> changes BT_DBG to bt_dev_dbg.
>
> Please review and provide any feedback.

so I was planning to apply patches 1-4. The only thing that I noticed was that patch 2 introduces the following warning.

CC net/bluetooth/hci_request.o
net/bluetooth/hci_request.c: In function âhci_req_prepare_suspendâ:
net/bluetooth/hci_request.c:973:6: warning: unused variable âold_stateâ [-Wunused-variable]
973 | int old_state;
| ^~~~~~~~~

I think this variable should only be introduced in patch 4. Are you able to respin this series so that the variable moves to patch 4. If not, I can try to fix this myself.

Regards

Marcel