[PATCH bpf-next v4 06/12] bpf: sockmap: simplify sock_map_init_proto

From: Lorenz Bauer
Date: Mon Mar 09 2020 - 07:13:32 EST


We can take advantage of the fact that both callers of
sock_map_init_proto are holding a RCU read lock, and
have verified that psock is valid.

Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/core/sock_map.c | 19 ++++---------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/sock_map.c b/net/core/sock_map.c
index cb240d87e068..edfdce17b951 100644
--- a/net/core/sock_map.c
+++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
@@ -141,28 +141,17 @@ static void sock_map_unref(struct sock *sk, void *link_raw)
}
}

-static int sock_map_init_proto(struct sock *sk)
+static int sock_map_init_proto(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock)
{
- struct sk_psock *psock;
struct proto *prot;

sock_owned_by_me(sk);

- rcu_read_lock();
- psock = sk_psock(sk);
- if (unlikely(!psock)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
prot = tcp_bpf_get_proto(sk, psock);
- if (IS_ERR(prot)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ if (IS_ERR(prot))
return PTR_ERR(prot);
- }

sk_psock_update_proto(sk, psock, prot);
- rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
}

@@ -241,7 +230,7 @@ static int sock_map_link(struct bpf_map *map, struct sk_psock_progs *progs,
if (msg_parser)
psock_set_prog(&psock->progs.msg_parser, msg_parser);

- ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk);
+ ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk, psock);
if (ret < 0)
goto out_drop;

@@ -286,7 +275,7 @@ static int sock_map_link_no_progs(struct bpf_map *map, struct sock *sk)
return -ENOMEM;
}

- ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk);
+ ret = sock_map_init_proto(sk, psock);
if (ret < 0)
sk_psock_put(sk, psock);
return ret;
--
2.20.1