Re: [PATCH v28 16/22] x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:03:54AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> We've also discussed taking a file descriptor to hold the backing, but
> unless I'm misreading the pagecache code, that doesn't solve the incorrect
> accounting problem because the current task, i.e. evicting task, would be
> charged.  In other words, whether the backing is kernel or user controlled
> is purely an ABI question.

Even if the file is owned by a different process the account happens
to "current"?

/Jarkko