Re: [PATCH v2 06/18] m68k: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq()

[afzal mohammed]

Hi Finn,

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 05:26:17PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:

> I had assumed that your intention was to find a consensus so that the 
> whole tree could be consistently and automatically improved

Yeah, my main goal was to get rid of setup_irq(), other things were
secondary and proceeded to achieve the removal by hook or crook, but was
caught red handed :)

> > Sometimes had a feeling as though the changes in this series is akin to 
> > cutting the foot to fit the shoe ;), but still went ahead as it was 
> > legacy code, easier & less error prone. But now based on the overall 
> > feedback, to proceed, i had to change.
> > 
> 
> Not based on feedback from me I hope -- I have no veto in this case, as 
> you can see from MAINTAINERS.

i don't know what to say, i attempted to accomodate the reviews as
much as possible, some times when opinions are conflicting i had to
take a call one way or the other, with more importance to maintainer's
view.

Regards
afzal