[PATCH 5.4 129/152] lib/vdso: Make __arch_update_vdso_data() logic understandable

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 9a6b55ac4a44060bcb782baf002859b2a2c63267 upstream.

The function name suggests that this is a boolean checking whether the
architecture asks for an update of the VDSO data, but it works the other
way round. To spare further confusion invert the logic.

Fixes: 44f57d788e7d ("timekeeping: Provide a generic update_vsyscall() implementation")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200114185946.656652824@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 include/asm-generic/vdso/vsyscall.h |    4 ++--
 kernel/time/vsyscall.c              |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/include/asm-generic/vdso/vsyscall.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/vdso/vsyscall.h
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ static __always_inline struct vdso_data
 #endif /* __arch_get_k_vdso_data */
 
 #ifndef __arch_update_vdso_data
-static __always_inline int __arch_update_vdso_data(void)
+static __always_inline bool __arch_update_vdso_data(void)
 {
-	return 0;
+	return true;
 }
 #endif /* __arch_update_vdso_data */
 
--- a/kernel/time/vsyscall.c
+++ b/kernel/time/vsyscall.c
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ void update_vsyscall(struct timekeeper *
 	struct vdso_timestamp *vdso_ts;
 	u64 nsec;
 
-	if (__arch_update_vdso_data()) {
+	if (!__arch_update_vdso_data()) {
 		/*
 		 * Some architectures might want to skip the update of the
 		 * data page.