Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] PCI: tegra: Add support for PCIe endpoint mode in Tegra194

From: Vidya Sagar
Date: Tue Mar 03 2020 - 05:35:16 EST




On 2/27/2020 5:18 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:44:11PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
Add support for the endpoint mode of Synopsys DesignWare core based
dual mode PCIe controllers present in Tegra194 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
V3:
* Addressed Thierry's review comments

I need his ACK to merge this series.

[...]

+static int tegra_pcie_ep_work_thread(void *p)
+{
+ struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie = (struct tegra_pcie_dw *)p;
+ u32 event;
+
+ while (true) {
+ wait_event_interruptible(pcie->wq,
+ !kfifo_is_empty(&pcie->event_fifo));
+
+ if (kthread_should_stop())
+ break;
+
+ if (!kfifo_get(&pcie->event_fifo, &event)) {
+ dev_warn(pcie->dev, "EVENT FIFO is empty\n");
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ switch (event) {
+ case EP_PEX_RST_DEASSERT:
+ dev_info(pcie->dev, "EVENT: EP_PEX_RST_DEASSERT\n");
+ pex_ep_event_pex_rst_deassert(pcie);
+ break;
+
+ case EP_PEX_RST_ASSERT:
+ dev_info(pcie->dev, "EVENT: EP_PEX_RST_ASSERT\n");
+ pex_ep_event_pex_rst_assert(pcie);
+ break;
+
+ case EP_HOT_RST_DONE:
+ dev_info(pcie->dev, "EVENT: EP_HOT_RST_DONE\n");
+ pex_ep_event_hot_rst_done(pcie);
+ break;
+
+ case EP_BME_CHANGE:
+ dev_info(pcie->dev, "EVENT: EP_BME_CHANGE\n");
+ pex_ep_event_bme_change(pcie);
+ break;
+
+ case EP_EVENT_EXIT:
+ dev_info(pcie->dev, "EVENT: EP_EVENT_EXIT\n");
+ return 0;
+
+ default:
+ dev_warn(pcie->dev, "Invalid PCIe EP event: %u\n",
+ event);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t tegra_pcie_ep_pex_rst_irq(int irq, void *arg)
+{
+ struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie = arg;
+
+ if (gpiod_get_value(pcie->pex_rst_gpiod)) {
+ if (!kfifo_put(&pcie->event_fifo, EP_PEX_RST_ASSERT)) {
+ dev_err(pcie->dev, "EVENT FIFO is full\n");
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (!kfifo_put(&pcie->event_fifo, EP_PEX_RST_DEASSERT)) {
+ dev_err(pcie->dev, "EVENT FIFO is full\n");
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+ }
+ }
+
+ wake_up(&pcie->wq);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+

[...]

+static int tegra_pcie_config_ep(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie,
+ struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie->pci;
+ struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
+ struct dw_pcie_ep *ep;
+ struct resource *res;
+ char *name;
+ int ret;
+
+ ep = &pci->ep;
+ ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "addr_space");
+ if (!res)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ep->phys_base = res->start;
+ ep->addr_size = resource_size(res);
+ ep->page_size = SZ_64K;
+
+ ret = gpiod_set_debounce(pcie->pex_rst_gpiod, PERST_DEBOUNCE_TIME);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to set PERST GPIO debounce time: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = gpiod_to_irq(pcie->pex_rst_gpiod);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ for PERST GPIO: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ pcie->pex_rst_irq = (unsigned int)ret;
+
+ name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "tegra_pcie_%u_pex_rst_irq",
+ pcie->cid);
+ if (!name) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to create PERST IRQ string\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ irq_set_status_flags(pcie->pex_rst_irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
+
+ ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pcie->pex_rst_irq,
+ tegra_pcie_ep_pex_rst_irq,
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
+ name, (void *)pcie);

I have the impression that a threaded IRQ is what you need, which
will also remove some boilerplate in the process. Any reason why
you can't use a threaded IRQ instead of a standalone kthread ?
No reason specifically. We started with kthreads and continued with that. I'll post a new series with threaded IRQ. It should be doable.

Thanks,
Vidya Sagar

Thanks,
Lorenzo