Re: [PATCH] kvm: selftests: Support dirty log initial-all-set test

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Tue Mar 03 2020 - 05:14:50 EST


On 03/03/20 11:00, Zhoujian (jay) wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 4:54 PM
>> To: Zhoujian (jay) <jianjay.zhou@xxxxxxxxxx>; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: peterx@xxxxxxxxxx; shuah@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; wangxin (U) <wangxinxin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>;
>> Huangweidong (C) <weidong.huang@xxxxxxxxxx>; Liujinsong (Paul)
>> <liu.jinsong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: selftests: Support dirty log initial-all-set test
>>
>> On 03/03/20 09:07, Jay Zhou wrote:
>>> #ifdef USE_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG
>>> - if (!kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2)) {
>>> - fprintf(stderr, "KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG not available, skipping
>> tests\n");
>>> + dirty_log_manual_caps =
>>> + kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_MANUAL_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT2);
>>> + if (!dirty_log_manual_caps) {
>>> + fprintf(stderr, "KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG not available, "
>>> + "skipping tests\n");
>>> + exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>>> + }
>>> + if (dirty_log_manual_caps != KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_CAPS &&
>>> + dirty_log_manual_caps !=
>> KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_PROTECT_ENABLE) {
>>> + fprintf(stderr, "KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG not valid caps "
>>> + "%"PRIu64", skipping tests\n",
>>> + dirty_log_manual_caps);
>>> exit(KSFT_SKIP);
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, instead of this final "if" it should be enough to do
>>
>> dirty_log_manual_caps &= (KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_PROTECT_ENABLE
>> |
>> KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET);
>>
>>
>> Otherwise looks good, I'll test it and eventually apply both patches.
>
> Do I need to resubmit this patch with this modification?

No, thanks.

Paolo