Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] scripts: Add script to generate dtb build information

From: Alexandre Torgue
Date: Mon Mar 02 2020 - 07:40:41 EST




On 2/21/20 8:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:52 AM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2/21/20 10:14 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
This commit adds a new script to create a file (in dts file directory) with
some information (date, Linux version, user). This file could then be used
to populate "build-info" property in every dts file that would use this
build information:

Example:

/ {
...
build-info = /incbin/("dtb-build.txt");

s/.txt/.dtsi/

and same wherever the file name is used.


...
};

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx>

diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.lib b/scripts/Makefile.lib
index bae62549e3d2..a5af84ef4ffc 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.lib
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.lib
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ quiet_cmd_gzip = GZIP $@
# DTC
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DTC ?= $(objtree)/scripts/dtc/dtc
+DTB_GEN_INFO ?= $(objtree)/scripts/gen_dtb_build_info.sh

# Disable noisy checks by default
ifeq ($(findstring 1,$(KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN)),)
@@ -286,6 +287,7 @@ $(obj)/%.dtb.S: $(obj)/%.dtb FORCE

quiet_cmd_dtc = DTC $@
cmd_dtc = mkdir -p $(dir ${dtc-tmp}) ; \
+ $(DTB_GEN_INFO) $(src) ; \
$(HOSTCC) -E $(dtc_cpp_flags) -x assembler-with-cpp -o $(dtc-tmp) $< ; \
$(DTC) -O $(2) -o $@ -b 0 \
$(addprefix -i,$(dir $<) $(DTC_INCLUDE)) $(DTC_FLAGS) \
diff --git a/scripts/gen_dtb_build_info.sh b/scripts/gen_dtb_build_info.sh
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..0cd8bd98e410
--- /dev/null
+++ b/scripts/gen_dtb_build_info.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+set -o nounset
+
+DTB_DIR=$1
+DTB_COMPILE_BY=$(whoami | sed 's/\\/\\\\/')
+DTB_INFO="From Linux $KERNELRELEASE by $DTB_COMPILE_BY the $(date).\0"

I would remove the filler words "From", "by", "the", and the trailing
period ('.').

<bikeshed>
You might consider using a format more like the Linux
kernel version line, which puts parenthesis around the
compiled by info.

IMO, we should use exactly the Linux kernel version line. Or exactly
the u-boot version line when built in u-boot.

I agree to keep the same format than Linux banner. But does it make sense to keep uts version, config flags ?

regards
Alex


Rob