RE: [PATCH V2] thermal: imx_thermal: Use __maybe_unused instead of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

[Anson Huang]

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: imx_thermal: Use __maybe_unused instead
> of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> 
> On 02/03/2020 09:26, Anson Huang wrote:
> > Hi, Uwe
> >
> >
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] thermal: imx_thermal: Use __maybe_unused
> >> instead of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 03:50:10PM +0800, Anson Huang wrote:
> >>> Use __maybe_unused for power management related functions instead
> of
> >>> #if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to simplify the code.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-KÃnig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> IMHO translating my "otherwise looks fine" in a "Reviewed-by" is a bit
> bold.
> >> Please don't assume this.
> >
> > OK, will keep it in mind next time, thanks.
> 
> When applying a patch, now we add the link to the lkml archive automatically.
> I can't apply this patch if the Reviewed-by is not accepted.
> 
> Or the Reviewed-by tag is confirmed or a V3 without the Reviewed-by must
> be resent.

I just sent a V3 patch to drop the reviewed-by tag, thanks.

Anson