Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix kernel build warning in test_idle_cores() for !SMT NUMA

From: Lukasz Luba
Date: Fri Feb 28 2020 - 05:02:32 EST




On 2/27/20 2:02 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
Building against tip/sched/core as of as ff7db0bf24db ("sched/numa: Prefer
using an idle CPU as a migration target instead of comparing tasks") with
the arm64 defconfig (which doesn't have CONFIG_SCHED_SMT set) leads to:

kernel/sched/fair.c:1525:20: warning: â??test_idle_coresâ?? declared â??staticâ?? but never defined [-Wunused-function]
static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Rather than define it in its own CONFIG_SCHED_SMT #define island, bunch it
up with test_idle_cores().

Fixes: ff7db0bf24db ("sched/numa: Prefer using an idle CPU as a migration target instead of comparing tasks")
[mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: Edit changelog, minor style change]
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 +++++++++-----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index fcc968669aea..10f9e6729fcf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1520,9 +1520,6 @@ static inline bool is_core_idle(int cpu)
return true;
}
-/* Forward declarations of select_idle_sibling helpers */
-static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def);
-
struct task_numa_env {
struct task_struct *p;
@@ -1558,9 +1555,11 @@ numa_type numa_classify(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
return node_fully_busy;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+/* Forward declarations of select_idle_sibling helpers */
+static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def);
static inline int numa_idle_core(int idle_core, int cpu)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present) ||
idle_core >= 0 || !test_idle_cores(cpu, false))
return idle_core;
@@ -1571,10 +1570,15 @@ static inline int numa_idle_core(int idle_core, int cpu)
*/
if (is_core_idle(cpu))
idle_core = cpu;
-#endif
return idle_core;
}
+#else
+static inline int numa_idle_core(int idle_core, int cpu)
+{
+ return idle_core;
+}
+#endif
/*
* Gather all necessary information to make NUMA balancing placement


Looks good (apart from odd formatting got in 'â??') and calms down
yesterday's build of next (next-20200227 were I spotted it) and today's
also.

Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>

Regards,
Lukasz