Re: [PATCH] kconfig: Add kernel config option for fuzz testing.

[Matthew Garrett]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 2:11 PM Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Here is an example of need to lockdown specific ations. Can we proceed?

As I said before, unless the thing being blocked is a primitive that's
intended to allow modification or reading of kernel memory (directly
or indirectly), I don't think lockdown is the right place for it to
be.