Re: [PATCH 2/5] KVM: VMX: Add guest physical address check in EPT violation and misconfig

From: Jim Mattson
Date: Thu Feb 27 2020 - 12:55:47 EST


On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 9:23 AM Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Check guest physical address against it's maximum physical memory. If
Nit: "its," without an apostrophe.

> the guest's physical address exceeds the maximum (i.e. has reserved bits
> set), inject a guest page fault with PFERR_RSVD_MASK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Gamal <mgamal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 63aaf44edd1f..477d196aa235 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -5162,6 +5162,12 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> gpa = vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
> trace_kvm_page_fault(gpa, exit_qualification);
>
> + /* Check if guest gpa doesn't exceed physical memory limits */
> + if (gpa >= (1ull << cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu))) {
> + kvm_inject_rsvd_bits_pf(vcpu, gpa);

Even if PFERR_RSVD_MASK is set in the page fault error code, shouldn't
we set still conditionally set:
PFERR_WRITE_MASK - for an attempted write
PFERR_USER_MASK - for a usermode access
PFERR_FETCH_MASK - for an instruction fetch

> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> /* Is it a read fault? */
> error_code = (exit_qualification & EPT_VIOLATION_ACC_READ)
> ? PFERR_USER_MASK : 0;
> @@ -5193,6 +5199,13 @@ static int handle_ept_misconfig(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * nGPA here instead of the required GPA.
> */
> gpa = vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
> +
> + /* Check if guest gpa doesn't exceed physical memory limits */
> + if (gpa >= (1ull << cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu))) {
> + kvm_inject_rsvd_bits_pf(vcpu, gpa);

And here as well?

> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu) &&
> !kvm_io_bus_write(vcpu, KVM_FAST_MMIO_BUS, gpa, 0, NULL)) {
> trace_kvm_fast_mmio(gpa);
> --
> 2.21.1
>