Re: [PATCH V2] EDAC: synopsys: Fix back to back snprintf() messages for CE/UE

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 04:34:12PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
> The current way which call snprintf() function two or three times to
> output message for CE/UE is incorrect, because it won't output all the
> message needed, instead it will only output the last message in
> snprintf(). So the simplest and most effective way to fix this problem
> is combining all the snprintf() message needed for CE/UE into one
> snprintf() function.
> 
> Fixes: b500b4a029d57 ("EDAC, synopsys: Add ECC support for ZynqMP DDR controller")
> Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in V2:
> - Separated this patch from the original patchset.
> - Change the subject to be more concise and clear.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c | 22 +++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
> index 2d263382d797..880ffd833718 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
> @@ -479,20 +479,14 @@ static void handle_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct synps_ecc_status *p)
>  		pinf = &p->ceinfo;
>  		if (!priv->p_data->quirks) {
>  			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> -				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d ",
> -				  "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
> -			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> -				 "Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x\n",
> +				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x",
> +				 "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col,
>  				 pinf->bitpos, pinf->data);
>  		} else {
>  			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> -				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d ",
> -				  "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
> -			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> -				 "BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d ",
> -				 pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr);
> -			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> -				 "Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x\n",
> +				 "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x",
> +				 "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col,
> +				 pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr,
>  				 pinf->bitpos, pinf->data);
>  		}
>  
> @@ -509,10 +503,8 @@ static void handle_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct synps_ecc_status *p)
>  				"UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
>  		} else {
>  			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> -				 "DDR ECC error type :%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d ",
> -				 "UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
> -			snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> -				 "BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d",
> +				 "DDR ECC error type :%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d",
> +				 "UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col,
>  				 pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr);
>  		}
>  
> -- 

I'm wondering how Manish did not see this in testing? CCed.

Anyway, queueing for urgent.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette