Re: [Patch v3] block: introduce block_rq_error tracepoint

From: Cong Wang
Date: Tue Feb 25 2020 - 15:37:43 EST


On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:40 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Jens
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 9:37 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, rasdaemon uses the existing tracepoint block_rq_complete
> > and filters out non-error cases in order to capture block disk errors.
> >
> > But there are a few problems with this approach:
> >
> > 1. Even kernel trace filter could do the filtering work, there is
> > still some overhead after we enable this tracepoint.
> >
> > 2. The filter is merely based on errno, which does not align with kernel
> > logic to check the errors for print_req_error().
> >
> > 3. block_rq_complete only provides dev major and minor to identify
> > the block device, it is not convenient to use in user-space.
> >
> > So introduce a new tracepoint block_rq_error just for the error case
> > and provides the device name for convenience too. With this patch,
> > rasdaemon could switch to block_rq_error.
> >
> > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can you take this patch?

Any response?

Thanks.