Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: m_can: Add Documentation for transceiver regulator

[Faiz Abbas]

Hi Rob,

On 20/02/20 2:05 am, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 07:58:34PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> Some CAN transceivers have a standby line that needs to be asserted
>> before they can be used. Model this GPIO lines as an optional
>> fixed-regulator node. Document bindings for the same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> This has moved to DT schema in my tree, so please adjust it and resend.

Ok.
> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt
>> index ed614383af9c..f17e2a5207dc 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/m_can.txt
>> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ Optional Subnode:
>>  			  that can be used for CAN/CAN-FD modes. See
>>  			  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/can-transceiver.txt
>>  			  for details.
>> +
>> +- xceiver-supply: Regulator that powers the CAN transceiver.
> 
> The supply for a transceiver should go in the transceiver node.
> 

Marc, while I have you here, do you agree with this?

Thanks,
Faiz