Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports

From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Thu Feb 13 2020 - 05:54:21 EST


On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:58:49AM +0800, peng.fan@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>
> SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports. Since there is no
> standardized id, we need to use vendor specific id. So
> add into devicetree binding doc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> index f493d69e6194..dacc62dc248b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node.
> protocol identifier for a given sub-node.
> - #size-cells : should be '0' as 'reg' property doesn't have any size
> associated with it.
> +- smc-id : SMC id required when using smc or hvc transports

IIUC, "arm,smc-id" is preferred more.

Why did you drop "arm,scmi-smc" ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep