Re: [Regression 5.6-rc1][Bisected b6231ea2b3c6] Powerpc 8xx doesn't boot anymore

From: Christophe Leroy
Date: Thu Feb 13 2020 - 01:17:06 EST




Le 13/02/2020 Ã 04:35, Qiang Zhao a ÃcritÂ:
On 02/12/2020 22:50 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
Sent: 2020å2æ12æ 22:50
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leo Li
<leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@xxxxxxx>; Greg
Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Scott Wood <oss@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; LKML
<linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Regression 5.6-rc1][Bisected b6231ea2b3c6] Powerpc 8xx doesn't
boot anymore

---
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
index 4cabded8390b..341d682ec6eb 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c
@@ -1351,6 +1351,7 @@ static int __init cpm_uart_console_setup(struct
console *co, char *options)
clrbits32(&pinfo->sccp->scc_gsmrl, SCC_GSMRL_ENR |
SCC_GSMRL_ENT);
}

+ cpm_muram_init();
ret = cpm_uart_allocbuf(pinfo, 1);

if (ret)

How about the patch like below? Just a draft.

Yes, I see the idea. I think we could go for something like that.
But in the powerpc 8xx case, we are talking about cpm_init(), not qe_init().

And maybe the return code should be checked, because if it's not 0, cpm_muram_init() won't have been called.

Thanks,
Christophe