Re: [PATCH 24/28] sound: Call cpu_latency_qos_*() instead of pm_qos_*()

From: Mark Brown
Date: Wed Feb 12 2020 - 05:08:14 EST


On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:34:15AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Call cpu_latency_qos_add/update/remove_request() and
> cpu_latency_qos_request_active() instead of
> pm_qos_add/update/remove_request() and pm_qos_request_active(),
> respectively, because the latter are going to be dropped.

What's the story with dependencies here, I only have this patch and not
the cover letter?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature