Re: [PATCH v2] tracing/perf: Move rcu_irq_enter/exit_irqson() to perf trace point hook

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Feb 12 2020 - 03:06:05 EST


On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:54:57AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:32:13PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:29:52PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > +#define trace_rcu_enter() \
> > > +({ \
> > > + unsigned long state = 0; \
> > > + if (!rcu_is_watching()) { \
> >
> > Also, afaict rcu_is_watching() itself needs more love, the functio has
> > notrace, but calls other stuff that does not have notrace or inline.
>
> Good catch! Like this?
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 1f5fdf7..51616e72 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void rcu_dynticks_eqs_online(void)
> *
> * No ordering, as we are sampling CPU-local information.
> */
> -static bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
> +static bool notrace rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)

Right, except that, given the size of the thing, I'd opt for 'inline'
over 'notrace'.