Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] selftests: KVM: Remove unused x86_register enum

From: Vitaly Kuznetsov
Date: Fri Feb 07 2020 - 10:08:12 EST


Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> x86_register enum is not used. Its presence incites us
> to enumerate GPRs in the same order in other looming
> structs. So let's remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 20 -------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> index 6f7fffaea2e8..e48dac5c29e8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
> @@ -36,26 +36,6 @@
> #define X86_CR4_SMAP (1ul << 21)
> #define X86_CR4_PKE (1ul << 22)
>
> -/* The enum values match the intruction encoding of each register */
> -enum x86_register {
> - RAX = 0,
> - RCX,
> - RDX,
> - RBX,
> - RSP,
> - RBP,
> - RSI,
> - RDI,
> - R8,
> - R9,
> - R10,
> - R11,
> - R12,
> - R13,
> - R14,
> - R15,
> -};
> -
> struct desc64 {
> uint16_t limit0;
> uint16_t base0;

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Vitaly