Re: [PATCH 04/17] follow_automount() doesn't need the entire nameidata

From: Christian Brauner
Date: Thu Jan 30 2020 - 09:45:27 EST


On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 03:17:16AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> only the address of ->total_link_count and the flags
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index d30a74a18da9..3b6f60c02f8a 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -1133,7 +1133,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(follow_up);
> * - return -EISDIR to tell follow_managed() to stop and return the path we
> * were called with.
> */
> -static int follow_automount(struct path *path, struct nameidata *nd)
> +static int follow_automount(struct path *path, int *count, unsigned lookup_flags)
> {
> struct dentry *dentry = path->dentry;
>
> @@ -1148,13 +1148,12 @@ static int follow_automount(struct path *path, struct nameidata *nd)
> * as being automount points. These will need the attentions
> * of the daemon to instantiate them before they can be used.
> */
> - if (!(nd->flags & (LOOKUP_PARENT | LOOKUP_DIRECTORY |
> + if (!(lookup_flags & (LOOKUP_PARENT | LOOKUP_DIRECTORY |
> LOOKUP_OPEN | LOOKUP_CREATE | LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT)) &&
> dentry->d_inode)
> return -EISDIR;
>
> - nd->total_link_count++;
> - if (nd->total_link_count >= 40)
> + if (count && *count++ >= 40)

He, side-effects galore. :)
Isn't this incrementing the address but you want to increment the
counter?
Seems like this should be

if (count && (*count)++ >= 40)

and even then it seems to me not incrementing at all when we have hit
the limit seems more natural?

Christian