Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: reorganize pvclock_gtod_data members

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 23/01/20 12:32, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Likely a personal preference but the suggested naming is a bit
> confusing: we use 'base_cycles' to keep 'xtime_nsec' and 'offset' to
> keep ... 'base'. Not that I think that 'struct timekeeper' is perfect
> but at least it is documented. Should we maybe just stick to it (and
> name 'struct pvclock_clock' fields accordingly?)
> 

The problem is that xtime_nsec is not nanoseconds, and I'd really not
want to have a worse name just for consistency. :(  I chose
"base_cycles" as an incremental improvement over nsec_base, even though
that meant also changing struct timekeeper's "base" to "offset".

Paolo