Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] gpiolib: have a single place of calling set_config()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

pon., 20 sty 2020 o 09:44 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ(a):
>
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 1:08 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Instead of calling the gpiochip's set_config() callback directly and
> > checking its existence every time - just add a new routine that performs
> > this check internally. Call it in gpio_set_config() and
> > gpiod_set_transitory(). Also call it in gpiod_set_debounce() and drop
> > the check for chip->set() as it's irrelevant to this config option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>

[snip!]

>
> These two lines are not equivalent: the new code no longer uses the
> packed value of mode and arg!
> Hence this leads to subsequent cleanups in commits e5e42ad224a040f9
> ("gpiolib: remove set but not used variable 'config'") and d18fddff061d2796
> ("gpiolib: Remove duplicated function gpio_do_set_config()").
>
> However, what was the purpose of the PIN_CONF_PACKED() translation?
> Why is it no longer needed?
>

Thanks for catching this. I was OoO for a couple days. I'll try to get
through the mail today and address this as well.

Bartosz