Re: [PATCH net 04/19] net/sonic: Add mutual exclusion for accessing shared state

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Mon Jan 20 2020 - 03:29:29 EST


Hi Finn,

On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 12:19 AM Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The netif_stop_queue() call in sonic_send_packet() races with the
> netif_wake_queue() call in sonic_interrupt(). This causes issues
> like "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (macsonic): transmit queue 0 timed out".
> Fix this by disabling interrupts when accessing tx_skb[] and next_tx.
> Update a comment to clarify the synchronization properties.
>
> Fixes: efcce839360f ("[PATCH] macsonic/jazzsonic network drivers update")
> Tested-by: Stan Johnson <userm57@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for your patch!

> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/sonic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/sonic.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static void sonic_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev)
> * wake the tx queue
> * Concurrently with all of this, the SONIC is potentially writing to
> * the status flags of the TDs.
> - * Until some mutual exclusion is added, this code will not work with SMP. However,
> + * A spin lock is needed to make this work on SMP platforms. However,
> * MIPS Jazz machines and m68k Macs were all uni-processor machines.
> */
>
> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ static int sonic_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> dma_addr_t laddr;
> int length;
> int entry;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> netif_dbg(lp, tx_queued, dev, "%s: skb=%p\n", __func__, skb);
>
> @@ -273,6 +274,8 @@ static int sonic_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> }
>
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> +

Wouldn't it be better to use a spinlock instead?
It looks like all currently supported platforms (Mac, Jazz, and XT2000)
do no support SMP, but I'm not 100% sure about the latter.
And this generic sonic.c core may end up being used on other platforms
that do support SMP.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds