Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add MCFG quirks for Tegra194 host controllers

From: Lorenzo Pieralisi
Date: Fri Jan 17 2020 - 07:17:47 EST

Next message: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/cpu] BUILD SUCCESS bb02e2cb715a3f3552dbe765ea4a07799e4dff43"
Previous message: Mrs. Loveth Konnia: "hi"
Next in thread: Thierry Reding: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add MCFG quirks for Tegra194 host controllers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 09:14:42AM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote:
> On 1/3/2020 11:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 11:50 AM Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The PCIe controller in Tegra194 SoC is not completely ECAM-compliant.
> >
> > What is the plan for making these SoCs ECAM-compliant? When was
> > Tegra194 designed? Is it shipping to end customers, i.e., would I be
> > able to buy one?
> Tegra194 is designed in 2017 and started shipping from 2018 onwards.
> Nothing much can be done for Tegra194 to make it fully ECAM compliant
> at this point in time. Tegra194 based development kits are available @
> https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/jetson-agx-xavier-developer-kit
> Currently the BSP has the kernel booting through Device Tree mechanism
> and there is a plan to support UEFI based boot as well in the future software
> releases for which we need this quirky way of handling ECAM.
> Tegra194 is going to be the only and last chip with this issue and next chip
> in line in Tegra SoC series will be fully compliant with ECAM.

ACPI on ARM64 works on a standard subset of systems, defined by the
ARM SBSA:

http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0029c/Server_Base_System_Architecture_v6_0_ARM_DEN_0029C_SBSA_6_0.pdf

These patches will have to be carried out of tree, the MCFG quirk
mechanism (merged as Bjorn said more than three years ago) was supposed
to be a temporary plaster to bootstrap server platforms with teething
issues, the aim is to remove it eventually not to add more code to it
indefinitely.

So I am afraid but this quirk (and any other coming our way) will not be
merged in an upstream kernel anymore - for any queries please put Nvidia
in touch.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> - Vidya Sagar
> >
> > I do not want to add these quirks indefinitely, and the first quirks
> > were added over three years ago.
> >
> > > With the current hardware design limitations in place, ECAM can be enabled
> > > only for one controller (C5 controller to be precise) with bus numbers
> > > starting from 160 instead of 0. A different approach is taken to avoid this
> > > abnormal way of enabling ECAM for just one controller and to also enable
> > > configuration space access for all the other controllers. In this approach,
> > > MCFG quirks are added for each controller with a 30MB PCIe aperture
> > > resource for each controller in the disguise of ECAM region. But, this
> > > region actually contains DesignWare core's internal Address Translation
> > > Unit (iATU) using which the ECAM ops access configuration space in the
> > > otherwise standard way of programming iATU registers in DesignWare core
> > > based IPs for a respective B:D:F.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 13 +++
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/pci-ecam.h | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> > > index 6b347d9920cc..a42918ecc19a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> > > @@ -116,6 +116,19 @@ static struct mcfg_fixup mcfg_quirks[] = {
> > > THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 12),
> > > THUNDER_ECAM_QUIRK(2, 13),
> > >
> > > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 0, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops,
> > > + DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x38200000, (30 * SZ_1M))},
> > > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 1, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops,
> > > + DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x30200000, (30 * SZ_1M))},
> > > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 2, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops,
> > > + DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x32200000, (30 * SZ_1M))},
> > > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 3, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops,
> > > + DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x34200000, (30 * SZ_1M))},
> > > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 4, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops,
> > > + DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x36200000, (30 * SZ_1M))},
> > > + { "NVIDIA", "TEGRA194", 1, 5, MCFG_BUS_ANY, &tegra194_pcie_ops,
> > > + DEFINE_RES_MEM(0x3a200000, (30 * SZ_1M))},
> > > +
> > > #define XGENE_V1_ECAM_MCFG(rev, seg) \
> > > {"APM ", "XGENE ", rev, seg, MCFG_BUS_ANY, \
> > > &xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > > index cbe95f0ea0ca..91496978deb7 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> > > @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> > > #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > > #include <linux/of_pci.h>
> > > #include <linux/pci.h>
> > > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
> > > +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
> > > #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > > #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > @@ -895,6 +897,99 @@ static struct dw_pcie_host_ops tegra_pcie_dw_host_ops = {
> > > .set_num_vectors = tegra_pcie_set_msi_vec_num,
> > > };
> > >
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS)
> > > +struct tegra194_pcie_acpi {
> > > + void __iomem *dbi_base;
> > > + void __iomem *iatu_base;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int tegra194_acpi_init(struct pci_config_window *cfg)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device *dev = cfg->parent;
> > > + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie;
> > > +
> > > + pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!pcie)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + pcie->dbi_base = cfg->win;
> > > + pcie->iatu_base = cfg->win + SZ_256K;
> > > + cfg->priv = pcie;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void atu_reg_write(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index,
> > > + u32 val, u32 reg)
> > > +{
> > > + u32 offset = PCIE_GET_ATU_OUTB_UNR_REG_OFFSET(index);
> > > +
> > > + writel(val, pcie->iatu_base + offset + reg);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void program_outbound_atu(struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie, int index,
> > > + int type, u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u64 size)
> > > +{
> > > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr),
> > > + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
> > > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(cpu_addr),
> > > + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
> > > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(pci_addr),
> > > + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
> > > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, lower_32_bits(cpu_addr + size - 1),
> > > + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
> > > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, upper_32_bits(pci_addr),
> > > + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
> > > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, type, PCIE_ATU_CR1);
> > > + atu_reg_write(pcie, index, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void __iomem *tegra194_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus,
> > > + unsigned int devfn, int where)
> > > +{
> > > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata;
> > > + struct tegra194_pcie_acpi *pcie = cfg->priv;
> > > + u32 busdev;
> > > + int type;
> > > +
> > > + if (bus->number < cfg->busr.start || bus->number > cfg->busr.end)
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +
> > > + if (bus->number == cfg->busr.start) {
> > > + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0)
> > > + return pcie->dbi_base + where;
> > > + else
> > > + return NULL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + busdev = PCIE_ATU_BUS(bus->number) | PCIE_ATU_DEV(PCI_SLOT(devfn)) |
> > > + PCIE_ATU_FUNC(PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> > > +
> > > + if (bus->parent->number == cfg->busr.start) {
> > > + if (PCI_SLOT(devfn) == 0)
> > > + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0;
> > > + else
> > > + return NULL;
> > > + } else {
> > > + type = PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + program_outbound_atu(pcie, PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0, type,
> > > + cfg->res.start + SZ_128K, busdev, SZ_128K);
> > > + return (void __iomem *)(pcie->dbi_base + SZ_128K + where);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops = {
> > > + .bus_shift = 20,
> > > + .init = tegra194_acpi_init,
> > > + .pci_ops = {
> > > + .map_bus = tegra194_map_bus,
> > > + .read = pci_generic_config_read,
> > > + .write = pci_generic_config_write,
> > > + }
> > > +};
> > > +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PCI_QUIRKS) */
> > > +
> > > static void tegra_pcie_disable_phy(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie)
> > > {
> > > unsigned int phy_count = pcie->phy_count;
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h
> > > index a73164c85e78..6156140dcbb6 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/pci-ecam.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pci-ecam.h
> > > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ extern struct pci_ecam_ops pci_thunder_ecam_ops; /* Cavium ThunderX 1.x */
> > > extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v1_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v1 */
> > > extern struct pci_ecam_ops xgene_v2_pcie_ecam_ops; /* APM X-Gene PCIe v2.x */
> > > extern struct pci_ecam_ops al_pcie_ops; /* Amazon Annapurna Labs PCIe */
> > > +extern struct pci_ecam_ops tegra194_pcie_ops; /* Tegra194 PCIe */
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_HOST_COMMON
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
>

Next message: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/cpu] BUILD SUCCESS bb02e2cb715a3f3552dbe765ea4a07799e4dff43"
Previous message: Mrs. Loveth Konnia: "hi"
Next in thread: Thierry Reding: "Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add MCFG quirks for Tegra194 host controllers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]