RE: [PATCH v10 09/14] exfat: add misc operations

[Namjae Jeon]

> This is what I think the timezone mount option should be used
> for: if we don't know what the timezone was for the on-disk timestamp, use
> the one provided by the user. However, if none was specified, it should be
> either sys_tz or UTC (i.e. no conversion). I would prefer the use of UTC
> here given the problems with sys_tz, but sys_tz would be more consistent
> with how fs/fat works.
Hi Arnd,

Could you please review this change ?

/* Convert a EXFAT time/date pair to a UNIX date (seconds since 1 1 70). */
void exfat_get_entry_time(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi, struct timespec64 *ts,
                __le16 time, __le16 date, u8 tz)
{       
        u16 t = le16_to_cpu(time);
        u16 d = le16_to_cpu(date);
        
        ts->tv_sec = mktime64(1980 + (d >> 9), d >> 5 & 0x000F, d & 0x001F,
                              t >> 11, (t >> 5) & 0x003F, (t & 0x001F) << 1);
        ts->tv_nsec = 0;
        
        if (tz & EXFAT_TZ_VALID)
                /* Adjust timezone to UTC0. */
                exfat_adjust_tz(ts, tz & ~EXFAT_TZ_VALID);
        else    
                /* Convert from local time to UTC using time_offset. */
                ts->tv_sec -= sbi->options.time_offset * SECS_PER_MIN;
}

/* Convert linear UNIX date to a EXFAT time/date pair. */
void exfat_set_entry_time(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi, struct timespec64 *ts,
                __le16 *time, __le16 *date, u8 *tz)
{
        struct tm tm;
        u16 t, d;

        time64_to_tm(ts->tv_sec, 0, &tm);
        t = (tm.tm_hour << 11) | (tm.tm_min << 5) | (tm.tm_sec >> 1);
        d = ((tm.tm_year - 80) <<  9) | ((tm.tm_mon + 1) << 5) | tm.tm_mday;

        *time = cpu_to_le16(t);
        *date = cpu_to_le16(d);

        /*
         * Record 00h value for OffsetFromUtc field and 1 value for OffsetValid
         * to indicate that local time and UTC are the same.
         */
        *tz = EXFAT_TZ_VALID;
}

Thanks!